The One Left
Everywhere we go, there is this one, many ones actually. When in a group there is always people with different traits such as the most commonly seen bossy one, noisy one, quiet one and the complaining one. The magnitude of these four kinds of people will definitely defer from one group to another. When people become over bossy, and controls every single thing, they will look like a tyrant. The noisy type of people lighten mood all the time but when they start to talk nonsense and never seem to be serious even when doing work, they will tend to get on other people’s nerves. The quiet seldom talks and are generally easy going. However, if they are quiet all the time, he/she will look more like anti social. Complaining helps getting the rights we deserve but there is always a limit. If we complain about every minor detail, we will start to nag and of course this is not a good thing.
When these traits of anyone become unbearable, they will become the one, the ostracized one. This is also a phenomenon that occurs everywhere. Like a joker/old maid/donkey card or whatever card games you play, this person will be seen as the extra one and no one wants to keep it in your hand. We will try our best to avoid them at all cost.

However, there is this weird effect resulting from the irritating aura emitted by the ‘outcasts’ – the uniting of the class. The mystical power will somehow unite the initially scattered class. I suppose that with a common target, people unite. Then, among the united clan, a leader will rise… OK, before moving on, i really hope that this poly class can proof to me that this phenomenon does not occur every time…
The One Leading

In a group, someone has to lead or else, the group will be heading nowhere. Leaders will change time-to-time, just like emperors of the past or ministers of today. In small group context, the change of leader may or may not be due to incapability. For instance, when deciding for work related problems, person A will take charge whereas person B will take charge when it comes to recreational events planning. In some cases, all members of the group might have a chance to lead at different times unlike the governing system of a country where leaders lead and followers follow (let’s not go into political issues here shall we?).
Like we have different kinds of irritating people, we also have different kinds of leaders, but its much simpler as there is only 2 types – the good ones and the bad ones. Good leaders lead by example and are open to suggestions. They are assertive when it needs be, speak only the necessary, commanding respect when keeping quiet and never complain about how tough being a leader is. Bad leaders are simply the reverse. I have seen people who literally cannot lead but are being assigned a leadership role (you guys can guess where I saw them right? That’s right, during my 2 years of ‘jail’). They do nothing when they are required to react and complain about how difficult it is to be leading. ‘You try to be in my position then you will know how I feel’, ‘You so good then you be commander lah’, when people say something like that, they fail immediately. These statements actually harbor tones of despising and undermining. When superior look down on subordinate, the trust between them is gone and nothing can work out. The worst statement I have ever heard in my life will be ‘If you do not respect me, respect my rank’. I will always reply back in my heart, ‘Like you respect my rank. It’s not high up, but I take pride in my rank.’
Many a time, leaders forget that their authority lies with the people underneath. If there is no one under them, what do they lead? So the higher up someone climbs, the higher tendency for them to neglect this fact and even good leaders will become bad ones. Whenever we lead, just keep this in mind – commanding respect and respecting command (perhaps this is the only good phrase SAF can ever come out with).
Moving back to the ‘leader’ leading the united clan against the ostracized one, this type of leader belongs to a slightly different type. Some call them comrade leaders while others call them peer leaders. Basically, they are people who lead fellow people of the same level. This kind of leaders can only be one type, the good ones. They will understand the importance of support as the ostracized one will act as a constant reminder for them. Furthermore, if the group is unhappy about this leader of theirs, they can talk to him/her immediately and problems can be trashed out and sorted out quickly. So in this united clan, different people take turns to lead for different issues, while some others will enjoy playing the supportive roles and never take charge. Among the group, we will also have a small group who are in the clan because they do not want to be ostracized like ‘the one’ just because they are all right with him/her. Peer pressure comes into the picture as silent as ever.

We want to be something and do not want to be something else. We choose our own path, but the outcome will defer from others. Everyone is unique and is the one and only.
The one and only
Everyone belongs to a certain story. We are the protagonists of our own stories. People whom we know will appear in our story as supporting roles. Though we are in the story, we are able to play a part in writing our story. Some people like their story to have something big in it, while others enjoy having a peaceful story. In this world of ours, we perceive and react to things in way that others done. This is called personality.
As I have mentioned about the bossy, noisy, quite and the complaining kind of people around, there is actually a personality categorization them – DISC (dominance, influence, steadiness and conscientiousness). Actually, that categorization was taken from a quiz I had taken before.
- ‘Dominance’ refers to those that can be described as a bulldozer. They do what they want and getting rid of those in their way. They are forceful and will do anything so long the goal is achieved.
- ‘Influence’ people are easily recognized by their power of speech. They are able to talk through people and change their decision. However, when it comes to hands on, they might not be as good as their talking.
- ‘Steadiness’ will be a nice word for those ‘quiet’. They will not do much talking as most of the time and will usually play the passive role in a group. They enjoy staying neutral during arguments and are generally peace loving. They are also the easiest going group and the most co-operative kind.
- ‘Conscientiousness’ people are on high alert mode most of the time. I dun mean that they are paranoid but they have a high tendency for that. They are usually cautious, meticulous, calculative and curious. They prefer to do things in a systematic way and sadly, have the highest tendency of irritating other people.
However, one will not belong totally to a certain category, i.e. A is dominant, B is steady etc. Rather, think of it as attributes, like attack, defense and speed. So, everyone will have a core personality supported by one or a few sub-personalities. For instance, take my result. It was something like D 44, I 28, S 8, and C 20. That would means I am very D (back then) and followed by ‘I’ and ‘C’. And I am so not S. Personality change with time, so I wonder how will my result look like if I redo the test.
There is no such thing as the best personality of the four. What we need is balance. Group with a good mix of people of the 4 personalities can have things done efficiently as each of them fill in the bad points of the others. When ‘I’ talk too much, ‘C’ will pull them back. When ‘C’ makes too many alternative solutions for something, ‘D’ will choose one out for them. When ‘D’ is getting tyranny, ‘S’ can tone them down. When ‘S’ is too quiet, ‘I’ can ‘lure’ them to speak up.
In conclusion, everyone plays a part in life, no matter how in significant it is. We are all different; different personality, different IQ, different EQ. Being different, we are unique, we are one.

Ok, this picture brings us back to the 1st topic of my post- the one left. I urge everyone reading my post, be a good leading one, or be a co-operative one, but never, the left out one.
*feel free to leave a comment about your views about me being D,I,S or C*
free online DISC test: http://www.mtselect.co.uk/testing/DISC.htm